data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b36/d7b368941423e42a816cb4e086b9ff75b00ed3ef" alt=""
Anthony is one of the first great monastic saints. He is traditionally a patron of hospitals and hospices, and of pigs (for complicated reasons that have nothing to do with his own life, but probably explain the local chapel). An account of his life was written by a friend and admirer, Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, while in exile for being too vocal in his opposition to those with powerful political patrons who refused to accept the Nicene Creed as definitive. By Athanasius’s account, Anthony was an orphaned young man from a wealthy background who was inspired by the Gospel he heard read in church to sell his property and move into the Egyptian desert to pray in solitude. As followers, helpers and those needing help sought him out and joined him there, he became the ‘father’ of the first Christian monastic community, the first ‘abbot’, and one who could guide others in fighting temptation.
Since the Middle Ages Anthony has often been represented in Western art as a lonely figure beset by demons (as in the Sforza Hours, shown). Artists of every period since have gravitated to this image of the solitary battling with temptation. For Romantics, the theme often seems an excuse to depict provocatively posed nudes, but in the earlier tradition, Anthony’s temptations were depicted as monstrous nuisances. It was only when he was a young man new to a solitary life that the devil tried him with the appearance of a naked woman, and other direct temptations to sin. As he grew in spiritual experience, the assaults became stranger and more subtle, aimed to terrify, distract, or make complacent, or even, most subtly of all: to use shame at past failings as a spur to more fearful devotion, to more frequent prayer and to more strenuous fasting than their intended victim could endure, instilling a sense of spiritual insufficiency and despair when exhaustion and unavoidable failure set in.
But no heed must be paid them even if they arouse to prayer, even if they counsel us not to eat at all, even though they seem to accuse and cast shame upon us for those things which once they allowed. For they do this not for the sake of piety or truth, but that they may carry off the simple to despair; and that they may say the discipline is useless, and make men loathe the solitary life as a trouble and burden, and hinder those who in spite of them walk in it.The first time I read this I thought one would have to be pretty far advanced in a life of prayer for it to apply. Now I’m not so sure. One of the first things Anthony told his monks was not to rely on experience; ‘Not to say, “We have lived in the discipline a long time,” but rather to make a new beginning daily.’ By the end of his life, his long single combat had made him a recognized expert on temptation. He is quoted liberally in Sayings of the Desert Fathers (quoted here from Benedicta Ward’s Penguin Books translation). For example, with advice on the basics of monastic life (perfectly applicable to life in the world, although rather counter-cultural now):
Do not trust in your own righteousness. Do not go on sorrowing over a deed that is past. Keep your tongue and your belly under control.On quiet:
He who sits alone and is quiet has escaped from three wars: hearing, speaking, seeing; but there is one thing against which he must continually fight: his own heart.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c6bb/1c6bb776aa08131872ed10f23bbadebecdfe63a6" alt=""
At length it was arranged that each should seize the loaf on the side nearest to himself, pull towards him, and keep for his own the part left in his hands. Then on hands and knees they drank a little water from the spring, and offering to God the sacrifice of praise passed the night in vigil.Paul told Anthony that he was close to death, and asked to be buried in a cloak that Anthony had been given by Bishop Athanasius, ‘not because he cared much whether his corpse when it decayed were clothed or naked (why should he indeed, when he had so long worn a garment of palm-leaves stitched together?); but that he might soften his friend's regrets at his decease.’ The sensitivity and psychological subtlety of the desert fathers is remarkable. When Anthony returned with the cloak, Paul was dead. Anthony wrapped his corpse and buried it in a hole dug by two desert lions. In exchange he took Paul’s palm-leaf cloak, wearing it to celebrate Easter and Pentecost. Anthony attached great importance to burial, telling his monks that ‘he who did not bury the bodies of the dead after death transgressed the law.’ While neither of the sources for his life mentions it, there is an assumption in art that when he was buried, Paul’s cloak was his shroud.
Paul the Hermit’s feast is 15 January, Anthony the Great’s is 17 January.
Paul Arblaster is my second oldest internet acquaintance (The oldest is Mary who also comments on this blog.).
If you want to see all of the posts in this series, click HERE.
I'm impressed that in the 1980s there would be enough people to mount a strong lobbying campaign for a public shrine, and enough sympathy in the corridors of power for such a campaign to be successful.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this, Paul. A picture of St Anthony and St Paul hangs in the house I grew up in, and hung there throughout my childhood, but Anthony is one of the saints I've known about so vaguely that it's embarrassing.
This is great, Paul. Sorry for not saying anything earlier. My schedule has been changing and it's kept me busy. Thanks so much.
ReplyDeleteAMDG
Now that I'm not on my phone--This St. Paul is your patron saint? That's very interesting. I'd never heard of him.
ReplyDelete"Do not go on sorrowing over a deed that is past." Such good advice--it's so easy to let your past paralyze you.
AMDG
From Paul:
ReplyDeleteOne of the stories I would have included if I hadn't thought the post was getting too long is that of Anthony and the huntsmen, which can be found at this blog (by a different Mac). I think I first came across it in something by Thomas Merton and just found it on that blog by googling to find a version online.
And the rest of that comment:
ReplyDeleteAgain, it has a personal application. It's starting to dawn on me that while I don't drive myself hard spiritually, I do drive myself hard in other ways, and that interferes unduly with what really ought to be more important (prayer and family, and other things). But I'm also wary of finding excuses for my natural slothfulness.
The other is his conversation with a visiting philosopher, who asked him how he managed without the consolation of books. He replied, "My book is nature, and I can read God's words in at any time." That sense of closeness to nature, and to God revealed in His creation, is something I'll come back to in my next contribution, about St Cuthbert.
I can't imagine living without books. That's real asceticism.
So glad to read this entry. Thank you, Paul and Janet, my oldest internet acquaintance. I enjoyed the story of this Saint Paul. I appreciated the story of Anthony and the huntsmen. All remind me to get to evening prayer --
ReplyDeleteI meant to mention earlier how excited I was by the news, published a couple of weeks ago, that a new Hieronymus Bosch painting of St Anthony had been identified in a collection in the States. The story (and a picture of the painting) can be found here.
ReplyDelete